Media unions, impartial journalists, and civil libertarians have for three years argued that Julian Assange need to not be prosecuted by the US Division of Justice for obtaining and publishing labeled materials that disclosed the extent of US wrongdoing in Afghanistan and Iraq. Now, as the WikiLeaks founder fights extradition from the United Kingdom to the United States, they’ve gotten some strong allies.
In a letter dispatched Monday to Lawyer Typical Merrick Garland, The New York Situations joined four important European publications—The Guardian, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, and El País—to argue that the endeavor to go immediately after Assange working with the Espionage Act “sets a unsafe precedent, and threatens to undermine America’s Initially Amendment and the independence of the push.” The issue is that, by prosecuting Assange underneath the draconian regulation that was penned in 1917 to prohibit interference with military services operations or recruitment during World War I, the Justice Section could generate a new instrument for overwhelming investigative reporters who simply request to inform